What are the Disadvantages of AI in Software Testing?
If you feel like the previous part confirms that you may be out of work… soon, don’t sell yourself short, at least for now. Here are the limitations AI has and will have for a considerable amount of time.
- Lacks creativity. AI for software testing algorithms experience big problems generating test cases that consider edge cases or unexpected scenarios. They need help with inconsistencies and corner situations.
- Depends on training data. Don’t forget — artificial intelligence is nothing else but an algorithm, a mathematical model being fed data to operate. It is not a force of nature or a subject for natural development. Thus, the quality of test cases generated by AI depends on the quality of the data used to train the algorithms, which can be limited or biased.
- Needs “perfect conditions.” I bet you’ve been there — the project documentation is next to none, use cases are vague and unrealistic, and you just squeeze information out of your client. AI can’t do that. The quality of its work will be exactly as good or bad as the quality of the input and context turned into quantifiable data. Do you receive lots of that at the beginning of your QA projects?
- Has limited understanding of the software. We tend to bestow superpowers on AI and its understanding of the world. In fact, it is truly very limited for now. May not have a deep understanding of the software being tested, which could result in missing important scenarios or defects.
- Requires skilled professionals to operate. For example, integrating a testing strategy with AI-powered CI/CD pipelines can be complex to set up, maintain, and troubleshoot, as it requires advanced technical skills and knowledge. Tried and true methods we use now may, for years, stay much cheaper and easier to maintain.
How AI-Based Software Testing Threatens Users and Your Business
There is a difference between what AI can’t do well and what can go wrong even if it does its job perfectly. Let’s dig into the threats related to testing artificial intelligence can take over.
- Bias in prioritization and lack of transparency. It is increasingly difficult to comprehend how algorithms are making prioritization decisions, which makes it difficult to ensure that tests are being prioritized in an ethical and fair manner. Biases can influence artificial intelligence models/tools in the data used to train them, which could result in skewed test prioritization.
Example. Suppose the training data contains a bias, such as a disproportionate number of test cases from a particular demographic group. In that case, the algorithm may prioritize tests in a way that unfairly favors or disadvantages certain groups. For example, the training data contains more test cases from men than women. The AI tool may assume that men are the primary users of the software and women are secondary users. This could result in unfair or discriminatory prioritization of tests, which could negatively impact the quality of the software for underrepresented groups.
- Overreliance on artificial intelligence in software testing. Lack of human decision-making reduces creativity in testing approaches, pushes edge cases aside, and, in the end, may cause more harm than good. Lack of human oversight can result in incorrect test results and missed bugs. Increased human oversight may lead to maintenance overheads.
Example. If the team relies solely on AI-powered test automation tools, they may miss important defects that could have significant impacts on the software’s functionality and user experience. The human eye catches inconsistencies using the entire background of using similar solutions. Artificial intelligence only relies on limited data and mathematical models. The more advanced this tech gets, the more difficult it is to check the results’ validity, and the riskier is overreliance. This overreliance can lead to a false sense of security and result in software releases with unanticipated defects and issues.
- Data security-related risks. Test data often contains sensitive personal, confidential, and proprietary information. Using AI for test data management may increase the risk of data breaches or privacy violations.
Example. Amazon changed the rules it’s coders and testers should follow when using AI-generated prompts because of the alleged data security breach. It is stipulated that ChatGPT has responded in a way suggesting it had access to internal Amazon data and shared it with users worldwide upon request.
So, What Will Happen to AI in Testing?
What is the future of software testing with AI?
We don’t know.
You don’t know.
Our partners at Virtuoso AI don’t know.
We can guess the general direction —
- Manual testers will get more into prompting and generate test scripts that will allow more coverage with fewer motions;
- Expert manual testers will also be more valued for human touch and human eye checking after AI testing tools;
- Test automation frameworks will be almost 100% driven by AI;
- Continuous testing will become more affordable than ever;
- “We needa large number of test cases” trend will be overrun by priritization in testing and monitoring;
- soon there will be tools for almost any testing needs, but only the most efficient and affordable solutions will survive the competition.
AI is transforming how we do software development and testing.
If you are a manual QA beginner — you better hurry and invest in your skills. The less expert and the easier to automate tasks you do now, the faster algorithms will come after your job. In the end, here is what Chat GPT thinks of it:
In our company, we started to apply AI-based tools for test automation back in 2022 and continue adopting new tech with new partners — Virtuoso, Google, Amazon, etc.
Will it be enough to stay relevant and efficient?
We definitely hope so. AI can help, but the software testing process is much more complex than just applying new tricks.