8. Browser and Platform Compatibility
A lot of challenges in applying automated testing come down to the variability of platforms and device settings. With hundreds of devices, dozens of operating systems and browsers, and an endless number of network configurations, the sheer volume of possible platform combinations often becomes a challenge of its own. It can be hard to account for all possible combinations in a large number of automation pipelines.
As a result, the team can get incomplete information on how the application behaves on certain platforms, leading to defects being discovered later in the development cycle or even by the end users, which is something teams should strive to avoid.
How to overcome
A highly effective strategy for increasing platform coverage for different forms of testing is using abstraction layers. They will encapsulate the differences in various operating systems and browsers, allowing the team to quickly and easily incorporate those differences in their test environments and configurations.
It’s also important to constantly stay on top of new device and software releases, as well as the operating system and browser versions, to be able to update the test settings and serve the customers better. Cloud-based testing platforms can be an excellent choice for testing across a variety of platforms without physical devices at hand, although physical devices obviously give a more comprehensive idea of how the application under test behaves in real-life conditions.
9. Rapid Changes in User Interfaces
For teams who design and maintain automation frameworks on a daily basis, testing UI components often proves to be one of the challenging tasks. There are two key reasons why this aspect of testing typically proves to be harder than it looks. First, UI testing largely depends on the complexity and variety of ways humans interact with the interface, which is a challenge on its own when it comes to automation. Second, UI elements are particularly prone to frequent changes and dynamic updates, meaning that automated UI tests that worked well a week ago may no longer be fully usable today.
How to overcome
Since UI changes are done to improve user experience and increase the product’s appeal to the customers, the only way to overcome this challenge is to adapt to the changing interface components. One of the most effective techniques to use is visual testing tools that can quickly indicate regressions caused by UI changes. Dynamic locators or XPath expressions can also be an efficient tool for adapting to the updated user interface. Moreover, the team should have robust error-handling mechanisms in place to resolve UI-related issues quickly.
10. Large Number of Third-Party Integrations to Consider
Modern software rarely exists and functions in complete isolation. Developers use a variety of third-party solutions to quickly enhance the functionality, performance, and user experience of a software product. This primarily includes an endless variety of APIs, as well as services like payment gateways or AI-powered bots. The variety and complexity of third-party systems create additional automation testing challenges, as the team now has to test not only the third-party solution on its own, but also the way it impacts the entire system and other integrations.
How to overcome
One of the popular ways to overcome the issue of multiple dependencies on third-party providers is to employ mocking or stubbing techniques to simulate responses from external dependencies during testing. Other solutions require the testing team to venture beyond their own organization to ensure comprehensive quality assurance. For example, the team may need to collaborate with the development team of the third-party service to better understand all the integration capabilities and potential challenges. Contract testing can also be a useful technique for mitigating the volatility of third-party integrations.
11. Extensive Maintenance Is Required for an Effective Test Automation System
An efficient test suite ensures comprehensive test coverage across different functional areas and incorporates edge cases that add significant value to the quality assurance process. However, when allowed to grow without close supervision, when it seems like another test script or a dozen will only benefit the project, an automated testing suite can start expanding uncontrollably, leading to a large number of cases that only take time to run without having any effect on the software quality.
Moreover, the team that got started with test automation may no longer be there for the whole duration of the project, which makes maintaining the test suite even more challenging.